Access Passport • 0–100
40% time-weighted PERE commitment • 25% Peregrine participation • 20% Access conduct/reputation • 15% Founder/contribution modifiers.
PEREGRINE ACCESS
Intelligence should lead
to better access.
Peregrine Access is the evidence-led opportunity network being built for qualifying participants. Projects move through discovery, diligence, published evidence, eligibility and post-launch monitoring before reaching an Access window.
1
Discover
Scout and research identify candidate projects and opportunities.
2
Diligence
Defined checks cover contracts, team/entity evidence, token distribution, vesting, liquidity, treasury, creator history, manipulation and conflicts.
3
Approve
Peregrine publishes evidence and only selected opportunities may proceed to an Access window.
4
Allocate
Eligibility uses the Access Passport and a capped waterfall, giving qualifying participants priority under published capacity rules.
5
Monitor
Post-launch monitoring tracks material changes, wallet behavior, liquidity and Covenant obligations where applicable.
Time-Weighted Commitment
Commitment uses time weighting and diminishing returns. Wallet balance alone cannot produce a 100/100 score.
Capped Waterfall
Round 1 base opportunity → Round 2 remaining capacity by Access Score band → Round 3 unused-allocation waterfall, with wallet/economic-cluster caps.
Access Levels
Scout • Falcon • Strike • Founder. Opportunity-specific rules, verification and jurisdictional restrictions still apply.
Founder Modifier
FIRST FLIGHT participants receive a time-boxed Founder Access Passport modifier and priority Access window where permitted, with allocations governed by published capacity rules.
Sybil / Cluster Controls
Linked wallets may be grouped as one economic actor when evidence is sufficient, reducing simple wallet-splitting advantages.
Evidence Dossier
Each eligible Access opportunity is intended to publish a defined evidence dossier covering the checks performed, material findings, unresolved unknowns and conflicts before an Access window opens.
COVENANT + BOND
Projects should have
skin in the game too.
Access v1.0 includes a Peregrine Covenant framework and an optional PERE Bond. Projects may be required to disclose team/entity information, token allocation, vesting, treasury wallets, liquidity setup, market-maker arrangements, paid promotion, material admin powers, related insider wallets and material post-review changes. Covenant commitments may include no hidden minting or blacklist controls, no undisclosed transfer restrictions, no deliberate wash trading or project-controlled fake volume, and cooperation with post-launch monitoring.
Objective breach examples can include falsified documentation, undisclosed insider wallets, project-controlled wash manipulation, prohibited LP removal, undisclosed contract/tokenomics changes or other Covenant violations. A token-price decline, market crash, commercial failure, ordinary roadmap delay without deception, or Peregrine analysis being wrong is not by itself a breach. Determinations follow Flag → Evidence → Project response → Determination → Appeal → Execution. The Bond is not insurance and does not guarantee participant reimbursement.
VETTING INTEGRITY
Payment cannot buy a better conclusion.
Projects may pay legitimate diligence, service or integration fees, but payment must never buy a better risk score or favorable conclusion. Material conflicts should be disclosed. “Vetted by Peregrine” means defined checks were completed — it does not mean risk-free or endorsed as an investment.
PROJECT PARTNERS
Building something real?
Early-stage teams can submit evidence for the Peregrine Access diligence pipeline. Submission starts a review; it does not guarantee a favorable conclusion, Access placement, allocation or endorsement.